The question for prosecutors reexamining the murder convictions of Lyle and Erik Menendez is not whether they killed their parents, but how culpable they really are.

A juror on the Menendez brothers’ trial said she believes that today’s world would have been more understanding about the complexity of the trauma suffered by sexual abuse victims — and would have acquitted the brothers of the 1989 murder of their parents.

The evidence prosecutors plan to consider includes a letter allegedly penned by Erik Menendez eight months before the murders and claims by another man that Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him in the 1980s.

The L.A. County district attorney is reviewing the case involving the brothers, who were convicted of shooting their parents to death in their Beverly Hills home.

The brothers have said they killed their parents out of self-defense after enduring a lifetime of physical, emotional and sexual abuse from them.

Erik and Lyle Menendez were convicted and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Los Angeles prosecutors said this week they are taking another look at the case.

The evidence prosecutors plan to consider includes a letter allegedly penned by Erik Menendez eight months before the murders and claims by another man that Jose Menendez sexually assaulted him in the 1980s.

A juror on the Menendez brothers’ trial thinks today’s more educated and woke world could have saved them — after it was announced Thursday that new evidence claiming the pair were sexually abused will be reviewed 30 years after they were found guilty of killing their parents.

Los Angeles prosecutors are revisiting the Menendez brothers' case as new evidence emerges, including a letter from Erik Menendez alleging sexual abuse by their father. The review considers how modern perspectives on abuse might change their sentencing.